Some medium format lenses have aberrations despite the smaller relative aperture. Some of the advantages above are only present in expensive medium format systems.
The slow pace can be useful to get the best out of each picture with regard to color and noise reduction, but that's not always the case.įor some medium format systems, you get post-processing tools that are parameterized differently from standard post-processing tools with regard to color rendering and other aspects.
#Full frame vs medium format full
You can use the full frame center to take pictures with less swirling or cat's eyes bokeh. With current medium format sensors, you get a larger dynamic range, which may be important in some cases. Thus, you generally have less aberrations at a given depth of field. a smaller aperture relative to the focal length). Heck, with some backs, even the cost of replacing the internal battery (most of which are now at the end of their expected lifespan) can exceed the price you paid for it!įrom an optical standpoint, you can realize the same depth of field with a larger aperture number (i.e. While you can often buy older digital backs inexpensively, the cost of repairing them is still keyed to their original MSRP, which means that even a minor repair could justify writing-off the back entirely. Personally, I would steer clear of using older digital backs with older film-camera bodies in favor of using more modern, all-in-one combos, such as those from Pentax and Fuji. YMMV, of course, but based on my experience, medium-format digital works quite well for traditional landscape photography, so if that's your preferred subject matter, it's definitely an option you should consider.
#Full frame vs medium format iso
That said, I made the jump to medium-format digital way back in 2010 and then jumped back in 2012, as it simply wasn't the correct tool for the type of photography I do (i.e., long-exposure-at-base ISO photos of urban and suburban street and alley scenes taken late at night.) If ever there was a time to spend a few hundred bucks to rent some gear before buying it, this appears to be it! So, all you medium format people: what are your thoughts? Is it worth the dive, or is staying firmly within the full frame world the way to go. This would simply be an addition to my tools. I do sell my prints, so this isn’t strictly a hobby thing (although it’s certainly not my primary line of business).įull frame gear for this. I think if I were to make the leap, I would get an older model Phase One digital back, and put it onto an older Mamiya 645 or Hasselblad body. I recognize that there’s a significant cost involved in getting into digital medium format, and that lens options are certainly going to be different and more limited and that there aren’t many bells and whistles. I’ve also read several reviews online where people say that in comparisons with the Sony R series, they’ve seen little technical advantage when comparing images. I’ve seen stuff on the internet, but we all know that seeing stuff on the web isn’t a great way of making decisions.
I’ve never seen a medium format picture in person. I understand the technical advantages of a bigger sensor. I always hear about people talking about the medium format look and how it’s different from full frame. I have, however, been very interested in medium format photography. I have a Sony a7riv, and I’m perfectly happy with it and the photos I get out of it.
I did a search and didn’t find much other than people selling gear or the Fuji group. So, First off, if i missed a medium format thread or group somewhere, I apologiZe.
0 kommentar(er)
